top of page
All Posts


Can Bail Be Denied for Non-Payment? Supreme Court Answers
Can bail be denied only because an accused fails to deposit money The Supreme Court of India, in Rakesh Jain v. State , Criminal Appeal No. 378 of 2026 (@ SLP (Crl) No. 11336 of 2025), has reiterated an important principle of criminal jurisprudence: bail cannot be made contingent upon monetary deposits or undertakings , nor can courts indefinitely defer a bail application on that basis Background of the Case The case arose out of FIR No. 200/2019, registered by the Economic O


The Jaypee Crisis Deepens: FIR Filed Against Suraksha Group Over Alleged Fund Diversion
FIR Filed Against Suraksha Group Over Alleged Fund Diversion The long-pending Jaypee Infratech insolvency and homebuyers’ plight has taken a new and troubling turn. On January 1, 2026, the Economic Offences Wing (EOW) of the Delhi Police registered a criminal FIR against Suraksha Realty Ltd and its partner Lakshdeep Investments & Finance Pvt. Ltd. over alleged diversion of funds meant for completing stalled Jaypee housing projects . For over 17,000 homebuyers in Jaypee Infra


Big Win for Homebuyers: HARERA Panchkula Orders Compensation for 9-Year Delay in BPTP Parklands Case
HARERA Panchkula Orders Compensation for 9-Year Delay in BPTP Parklands Case In the case of Renu Mathur vs. Countrywide Promoters Pvt. Ltd. (BPTP Group) , the Authority ruled in favor of the homebuyers, ordering the builder to pay significant delay interest and quashing illegal demands for increased super area and non-existent club charges. Case Background: A Decade of Waiting The complainants booked an independent residential floor in the project "Park 81" , located in Secto


HARERA Delivers Big Win for Neo Square Investors: Assured Returns Upheld & Illegal Charges Quashed
Victory for Neo Square Allottees: Assured Returns Upheld & Illegal 'Fit-Out Charges' Quashed. In a significant relief for commercial real estate investors, the Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (HARERA), Gurugram, has passed a decisive order against M/s Neo Developers Private Limited . The ruling, dated November 11, 2025, addresses key grievances regarding the "Neo Square" project in Sector 109, specifically concerning unpaid assured returns and arbitrary monetary dema


Delhi HC holds directors not liable under Section 138 NI Act where cheques are dishonoured due to account blockage after IBC moratorium.
Cheque dishonour during insolvency does not always attract criminal liability. The Delhi High Court clarifies the scope of Section 138 NI Act where accounts are blocked due to IBC proceedings. The intersection of cheque dishonour proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and insolvency proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) has been a recurring area of litigation. In a significant decision delivered on 16 December 2025 ,


Waiver of Statutory Timelines in Mutual Consent Divorce: Delhi High Court Clarifies the Law
Divorce by Mutual Consent: Can Courts Waive the One-Year Separation Period? The Delhi High Court’s ruling strikes a careful balance between the sanctity of marriage and the right to exit an unworkable marital relationship with dignity. It reinforces the principle that law must evolve with social realities and should not become an instrument of compulsion where consent is clear and informed.


India Implements the Four Labour Codes: What It Means for Workers & Employers
India Implements the Four Labour Codes: What It Means for Workers & Employers


Delhi HC: Unilateral Appointment of Arbitrator Invalid, but Fresh Arbitration Invocable
2024 Delhi HC decision: Limitation objections must go to the arbitrator, not the court.


New CPC Amendments on the Horizon: Delhi High Court Invites Public Feedback
Delhi High Court Proposes Amendments to Orders VI and VIII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Proposal to formally recognize "replication" as component of pleadings


Raheja Developers Faces Insolvency Proceedings: Key Takeaways from NCLT Delhi’s Order
NCLT Delhi admits application under Section 7 of the IBC, 2016 against Raheja Developers Limited. Homebuyers to file claim Form CA. Creditors to file their claims with IRP


Delhi High Court Reiterates Principles Governing Claims to Ancestral Properties
Property inherited by a person under Section 8 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 is taken by him in his individual capacity By Lex Horizon The Delhi High Court, in a recent judgment, has reiterated vital legal principles governing claims to ancestral properties. The Court was deciding an application under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 , moved by the defendants in a suit for partition filed by a daughter against her father and paternal aunt. It was th


Are RERA allottees entitled to further compensation after obtaining relief under Section 31 of the RERA Act, 2016?
RERA Allottees entitled to additional relief under Section 71 of the Act


Supreme Court Cracks Down on Cheque Bounce Case Backlog: New Guidelines Issued
Supreme Court issues guidelines for expeditious disposal of cheque dishonor/bounce cases


Notices via WhatsApp/Email by Police Invalid Under CrPC & BNSS, Says Court
CrPC & BNSS Don’t Recognize WhatsApp/Email as Valid Notice Service By Lex Horizon In a recent order, the Hon’ble Apex court issued...


Frivolous Complaints and Abuse of Process: SC Reiterates Principles Under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
SC reiterates distinction between consensual relationships and false rape allegations, emphasizing judicial duty to prevent misuse of criminal law.


Union Minister Shri Manohar Lal Launches Unified RERA Portal at 5th CAC Meeting
A milestone moment: Launch of the Unified RERA Portal to empower homebuyers and streamline real estate regulation. By Lex Horizon The 5th...


Delhi High Court: Courts Should Encourage Settlement and Condone Reasonable Delays in Filing Written Statement
Delhi High Court in VI-John Healthcare v. Dabur India held that courts should encourage settlement and condone reasonable delays in filing written statements, especially when within the 120-day limit under the Commercial Courts Act.


Madras HC: Article 227 Cannot Be Used to Summarily Throw Out Plaint
igh Court's extraordinary powers under Article 227 cannot be used to summarily throw out the plaint


A “personal loan,” even if advanced for business purposes, does not by itself amount to a “commercial dispute.”
A "personal loan", even if advanced for business purposes and carrying interest, will not inherently constitute a "commercial dispute" within the meaning of the Act of 2015


RERA Update: Allottees Not Entitled to Separate Compensation If They Choose to Stay in the Project
Allottees Not Entitled to Separate Compensation If They Choose to Stay in the Project
bottom of page
