Delhi High Court decision explaining the scope of Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC, reiterating that courts cannot partially reject a plaint and that the validity and interpretation of a joint Will must be examined during trial and not at the threshold stage. In a significant ruling that reinforces procedural safeguards in civil litigation, the Delhi High Court has reiterated that plaints cannot be rejected partially under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (C

2024 Delhi HC decision: Limitation objections must go to the arbitrator, not the court.

Property inherited by a person under Section 8 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956  is taken by him in his individual capacity By Lex Horizon The Delhi High Court, in a recent judgment, has reiterated vital legal principles governing claims to ancestral properties. The Court was deciding an application under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 , moved by the defendants in a suit for partition filed by a daughter against her father and paternal aunt. It was th

Delhi High Court in VI-John Healthcare v. Dabur India held that courts should encourage settlement and condone reasonable delays in filing written statements, especially when within the 120-day limit under the Commercial Courts Act.

Seat vs. Venue. In the absence of contrary indica, venue to be considered as seat